California Unemployment Fraud

Democratic Assemblywomen Cottie Petrie-Norris of Laguna Beach (center), who heads the Assembly Accountability and Administrative Review Committee, which has been looking into an unemployment benefits scam said Thursday that the Employment Development Department is failing in its efforts to improve performance while limiting a scam that could exceed $2 billion.

SACRAMENTO — A beleaguered California agency’s attempt to stem an unemployment benefits scam potentially exceeding $2 billion while reducing a frustrating backlog is failing, two state lawmakers from opposing political parties said Thursday, though others reported fewer problems.

Democratic Assemblywoman Cottie Petrie-Norris, who heads the Assembly Accountability and Administrative Review Committee, said she is seeing “a continued pattern of constituents who get lost in the process.”

Hundreds of residents across the state report “this sense of falling into a black hole where you don’t know what’s wrong, where you make phone calls that go unanswered, and you wait months and months for benefits and grow increasingly desperate,” she said.

Republican Assemblyman Jim Patterson, a frequent critic of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Democratic administration, cited complaints from two whistleblower employees of the Employment Development Department as well as customers who contacted his office in saying the new ID.me verification system “is failing substantially.”

The system frequently rejects legitimate forms of identification, requiring those seeking benefits to undergo a more painstaking verification that can take months, Patterson said. Other applicants are waiting as long as five hours to have their identity confirmed on a video chat call, he said.

Petrie-Norris said she and her colleagues were very hopeful the new verification system “was going to represent a positive turning point, and that doesn’t appear to be the case. So I think it’s fair to say there’s widespread concern and disappointment.”

But spokeswomen for other frequent Democratic Assembly critics including Lorena Gonzalez and Phil Ting said it has not been a major recent issue.

“We still have some constituents with ID verification issues, but it is far less than what we were seeing in the spring and summer,” said Jen Kwart, a spokesman for Democratic Assemblyman David Chiu. “While nothing is perfect, I think overall we would say ID.me has been an improvement.”

However, she, like Patterson, wants the department to provide how many claims are being processed automatically and how many are being sent for a manual review.

The company and department officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Social media accounts also show a problem where unemployed workers are “falling into this black hole where they are being rejected for no reason, they cannot get their application to be approved and they are part of the huge backlog,” Patterson said at a news conference.

The benefits applications backlog has grown again in recent weeks and may face more strain with new stay-home orders affecting nonessential employees in most of California. But Thursday’s backlog of 725,051 initial and continuing claims was far below the peak of 1,695,102 on Sept. 24, before the department introduced the new verification system.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.